J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1957. 16:85-92.
© 1957 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Price, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Benne, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Price, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Benne, E. J.

Specific Gravity and Chemical Composition of the Untrimmed Ham as Related to Leanness of Pork Carcasses1

J. F. Price2, A. M. Pearson and E. J. Benne3

Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station,4

Abstract

The specific gravity of the untrimmed right ham was found to be closely associated with the specific gravity of the entire carcass with a correlation coefficient of .86. However, cut-out percentages, chemical composition of the ham, loin lean areas, and fat thickness measures were not as closely predicted by ham specific gravity as by carcass specific gravity. The correlation coefficients obtained between ham specific gravity and the above mentioned items were all highly significant.

In this study, contrary to previous work, carcass cut-out was more closely associated with live probe and backfat thickness than with specific gravity of the ham. However, specific gravity of the untrimmed ham more closely predicted its chemical composition than lean areas of the loin, carcass length, live probe, or backfat thickness.

Results indicated that specific gravity of the ham or carcass was a more reliable indicator of muscling, or actual meatiness, than live probe or backfat thickness. This conclusion was based on a higher correlation of specific gravity and loin lean areas than between fat thickness and lean areas. Added proof was drawn from the closer relation of specific gravity and chemical components than of fat thickness measures and chemical composition.

Carcass length showed no significant relationship with cut-out, chemical composition, or exterior fat thickness. Carcass length combined with backfat thickness or live probe gave little advantage over the use of backfat or live probe alone. Dressing percentage was not significantly associated with specific gravity or loin lean area. In this study the lean area of the loin measured at the tenth rib more closely predicted cut-out than the same area measured at the last rib.

In general, lean cut-out was more closely associated with other measures of leanness than primal cut-out.


Footnotes

1 Journal Article 1945 Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station, East Lansing.

2 From a portion of a thesis submitted by J. F. Price to the College of Agriculture, Michigan State University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the M.S. degree, 1956.

3 Departments of Animal Husbandry and Agricultural Chemistry cooperating.

4 Acknowledgement is made to W. T. Magee for suggestions in interpretation of the statistical analysis and to L. J. Bratzler, R. J. Deans, J. A. Hoefer and R. W. Luecke for advice and assistance in this study.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1957 by the American Society of Animal Science.