J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1956. 15:559-569.
© 1956 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albert, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Albert, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, H. W.

The Sulfur Requirement of Growing-Fattening Lambs in Terms of Methionine, Sodium Sulfate, and Elemental Sulfur1,2,

W. W. Albert, U. S. Garrigus, R. M. Forbes and H. W. Norton

Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station3

Abstract

A comparative study was made of the sulfur requirements of growing-fattening lambs in terms of methionine, sodium sulfate, and elemental sulfur, added to a purified ration containing 4% urea. The gains on five levels of each of the sulfur sources fitted a quadratic curve. On the basis of the fitted curves, the calculated sulfur percentage requirement was for methionine 0.64±0.048, for sodium sulfate 1.2 7±0.44, and for elemental sulfur 0.47±0.028, respectively.

On the basis of total sulfur about 70% less sulfur was needed as methionine in the diet than as elemental sulfur, or about 50% less as sulfate sulfur. The data suggest that sodium sulfate may be used more efficiently than elemental sulfur.

Satisfactory agreement was found between the sulfur requirements of growing-fattening lambs as reported in studies of two different years.


Footnotes

1 This is seventh paper in a series on a sulfur in sheep nutrition.

2 Grateful acknowledgement is extended to the E.I. duPont deNemours Company, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, for kindly providing the urea; to Merck and Company, Rahway, New Jersey, courtesy of Dr. H.H. Draper, for generously supplying thiamine hydrochloride and riboflavin: to Vio Bin Corporation, Monticello, Illinois, courtesy of Steve Varner, for generously supplying the wheat germ oil; to Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, courtesy of Dr. R.W. Colby, for kindly furnishing methionine; and to Calcium Carbonate Company, Quincy, Illinois, courtesy of W. A. Hensley, for generously suplying the chemical mixture used in this study.

3 Animal Science Department, Urbana.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1956 by the American Society of Animal Science.