J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1956. 15:134-140.
© 1956 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiltbank, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Casida, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wiltbank, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Casida, L. E.

Alteration of Ovarian Activity by Hysterectomy1

J. N. Wiltbank2 and L. E. Casida3

University of Wisconsin

Abstract

Complete removal of the uterus in the ewe or cow caused maintenance of the corpus luteum in most animals. The corpora lutea have been maintained for as long as 100 days in the ewe and 154 days in the cow. Longer intervals were not attempted. Removal of approximately half of the uterus in the ewe caused no delay in the return to estrus. Nearly complete removal of the uterus in the cow caused delay in the return to estrus. It was postulated that the corpora lutea, although maintained as anatomical structures, may not function at the same level as corpora lutea in intact animals.


Footnotes

1 Paper No. 590, Department of Genetics, University of Wisconsin. Published with the approval of the Director of the Agricultural Experiment Station. This work was done under a cooperative agreement between the Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station and the Dairy Husbandry Research Branch, U.S.D.A. It has been supported in part by grants from Badger Breeders' Cooperative, Consolidated Breeders' Cooperative, East Central Breeders' Cooperative, Southern Wisconsin Breeders' Cooperative and Tri-State Breeders' Cooperative.

2 Agent of the Dairy Husbandry Research Branch, U.S.D.A.

3 The authors wish to acknowledge aid in surgery given by N. C. Buch, A. S. El-Sheikh, H. W. Hawk, C. V. Hulet, H. E. Kidder, C. A. Kiddy and R. V. Short.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E.K. Inskeep
Cellular and Molecular Regulation of Luteal Formation, Function, and Regression: An Introduction
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2000; 63(1): 1b - 1.
[Full Text]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
G. D. Niswender, J. L. Juengel, P. J. Silva, M. K. Rollyson, and E. W. McIntush
Mechanisms Controlling the Function and Life Span of the Corpus Luteum
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2000; 80(1): 1 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1956 by the American Society of Animal Science.