J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1954. 13:81-88.
© 1954 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Legates, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Legates, J. E.

Genetic Variation in Services Per Conception and Calving Interval in Dairy Cattle1

J. E. Legates2

North Carolina State College, Raleigh

Abstract

Number of services per conception and the length of the interval between calvings were studied to determine the genetic variance in these commonly used measures of reproductive efficiency. The data included 1129 cows with services per conception for 2443 calvings and 1016 cows with 2419 calving intervals. The mean number of services per conception was 1.80 and the mean calving interval was 406 days. The estimate of heritability of services per conception was 0.026, while the intra-cow repeatability was zero. Heritability of calving interval length was zero; although, repeatability was 0.133.

Evidence from this study indicates little existing genetic variability in the two measures of reproductive efficiency studied. The number of services required for conception for one calving is of no value in predicting the number of services that will be required for a subsequent pregnancy. The length of calving interval does appear to be slightly more a characteristic of the individual cow than is services per conception. Application of genetic principles in selection for fewer services per conception or for a shortening of the length of calving interval has little to offer the dairy cattle breeder.

Footnotes

1 Contribution from the Department of Animal Industry, North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station. Published with the approval of the Director as Paper No. 513 of the Journal Series.

2 The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of the computing service of the Department of Experimental Statistics.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1954 by the American Society of Animal Science.