J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1953. 12:787-797.
© 1953 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Whitehair, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bell, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Whitehair, C. K.

Value of Urea Nitrogen in Rations Containing Different Carbohydrate Feeds1

Marvin C. Bell2, Willis D. Gallup and C. K. Whitehair

Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station3

Abstract

The value of urea as a source of nitrogen in rations containing different carbohydrate feeds was determined in three series of digestion and nitrogen balance trials with Hereford steers. The carbohydrate feeds used in formulating the different rations were yellow corn, dehydrated sweet potatoes, milo, barley, cane molasses and combinations of cane molasses and corn. Each of these feeds was combined with prairie hay and sufficient protein supplement to provide basal rations having 7–8 percent crude protein. Urea in the form of "Two-Sixty-Two" was added to each ration in amounts required to provide a total of 11–12 percent protein equivalent.

There were some differences among the basal rations in digestibility of nutrients ascribed to differences in the carbohydrate feeds. Addition of urea had very little effect on apparent digestibility of nutrients, other than protein (Nx6.25) which was increased in all rations. It improved nitrogen retention to a significant extent when added to each ration, a greater improvement being made when it was added to the corn ration than when added to the molasses rations.

Biological values calculated for the total nitrogen of the supplemented rations indicated that the urea nitrogen was utilized with equal efficiency in rations of different cereal grains and sweet potatoes, and with less efficiency in molasses-containing rations.

In a comparison of urea with soybean meal in barley rations, small differences in nutrient digestibility and nitrogen retention favored the soybean meal supplement.


Footnotes

1 This investigation was supported in part by a research grant from E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company, Inc.

2 Present address, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.

3 Departments of Animal Husbandly and Agricultural Chemistry Research.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1953 by the American Society of Animal Science.