J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1951. 10:683-692.
© 1951 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arias, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bethke, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Arias, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bethke, R. M.

The Influence of Different Amounts and Sources of Energy upon In Vitro Urea Utilization by Rumen Microorganisms1, 2,

Carlos Arias3, Wise Burroughs, Paul Gerlaugh and R. M. Bethke

Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station

Abstract

Six different sources of energy, dextrose, cane molasses, sucrose, starch, cellulose, and ground corn cobs, each at three respective levels, were studied in in vitro fermentation flasks with respect to their influence upon rumen microorganisms in converting urea nitrogen into bacterial protein. Each source of energy whether a readily available carbohydrate or a complex carbohydrate, such as cellulose, aided urea utilization provided the latter underwent digestion. It was observed that small amounts of a readily available carbohydrate aided cellulose digestion, which in turn increased urea utilization, whereas large amounts of such materials, inhibited cellulose digestion. These results are discussed with respect to the relative merits of different combinations of readily available and less available carbohydrates as sources of energy in bringing about maximum utilization of urea by rumen microorganisms.


Footnotes

1 Supported in part by grants from Swift and Company, Chicago, Illinois, and E. I. du Pont de Nemours Company, Wilmington, Delaware.

2 Published with approval of the Director of the Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station.

3 Part of the data presented was taken from a thesis presented to the Graduate School (1950) of the Ohio State University, by Carlos Arias in partial fulfillment of the degree, Master of Science.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1951 by the American Society of Animal Science.