HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cipolloni, M. A. Articles by Pavlech, H. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cipolloni, M. A. Articles by Pavlech, H. M.

Significance of the Differences in Digestibility of Feeds by Cattle and Sheep^{1, 2,}

West Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station and University of North Carolina

Abstract

Published data which allow the comparison of the digestive powers of cattle and sheep were analyzed statistically. Comparisons were made for the digestibility of organic matter, crude protein, crude fiber, N-free extract, and ether extract, and the contents of total digestible nutrients in each of the three feed classes, dry roughages, silages, and concentrates. To make the comparisons fair, covariance adjustment for proximate composition was conducted. Specific differences in the digestibility of the organic matter, crude fiber, nitrogen-free extract, and ether extract, and in the total digestible nutrient content of dry roughages were found to be statistically significant. In the case of silages and concentrates, species differences were significant only for ether extract. The interaction, species-by-feeds, was significant for the digestibility of protein in dry roughages and the digestibility of ether extract in concentrates, indicating that the differences in the digestibility favor cattle with certain feeds and sheep with others. Other differences, although not significant, were large enough to suggest a trend.

From the results, it was clear that greater accuracy will be attained if digestibility data to be used for cattle are obtained with cattle, and similarly for sheep.

¹ Supported in part by a grant from Swift & Company, Chicago, Illinois. Published with the approval of the Director, West Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, as Scientific Paper No. 423.

² From a thesis submitted by Mary Ann Cipolloni in partial fullfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at West Virginia University.

³ West Virginia University. Present address: The State College of Washington.

⁴ Institute of Statistics, University of North Carolina (Raleigh Campus).

⁵ West Virginia University.