J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1942. 1:213-220.
© 1942 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, R. T.

Cross Breeding for Beef Production1

Ralph W. Phillips2, W. H. Black2, Bradford Knapp, Jr.2 and R. T. Clark3

U. S. Department of Agriculture and Montana Agricultural Experiment Station

Abstract

Data are presented on the first phase of an experiment designed to test the possibilities of maintaining heterosis in beef cattle with a system of criss-crossing, using Hereford cows as a foundation, and using Shorthorn, Angus, and Hereford bulls to sire successive generations of offspring. The present study is based on 57 crossbred steers from Hereford cows and sired by Shorthorn bulls. Sixty-seven Hereford steers served as controls. Analyses of these data show that:

  1. The crossbred calves gained more rapidly in the feed-lot than the purebreds and were heavier at time of marketing. These differences were highly significant.
  2. The differences found between the purebreds and crossbreds in efficiency of gain, slaughter grade, and carcass grade were not statistically significant.
  3. The dressing percentage was higher in the crossbred than in the purebred steers.
  4. The crossbreds had fewer digestive disorders in the feed-lot than the purebreds,
  5. In general, the crossbred steers were less variable than the purebred steers.

These findings indicate that crossbreeding offers a means of increasing production per animal unit, and that it should be profitable, under conditions where the practice is compatible with other breeding and management practices.

Footnotes

1 Based on work conducted cooperatively by the U. S. Department of Agriculture and the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 Bureau of Animal Industry, Beltsville, Md.

3 Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, Bozeman, Montana.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1942 by the American Society of Animal Science.